Speaking with the People's Voice
How Presidents Invoke Public Opinion
Presidential Studies - Rhetoric - Political Science
6 x 9, 208 pp.
Table. Bib. Index.
Pub Date: 03/03/2014
Presidential Rhetoric and Political Communication
  cloth
Price:        $33.00 s

978-1-62349-044-7
title also available as an ebook:
More ebooks

Published by Texas A&M University Press
  THE CONSORTIUM

To Receive E-News
 
 
 

 

Speaking with the People's Voice

How Presidents Invoke Public Opinion

Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury

The role of public opinion in American democracy has been a central concern of scholars who frequently examine how public opinion influences policy makers and how politicians, especially presidents, try to shape public opinion. But in Speaking with the People’s Voice: How Presidents Invoke Public Opinion, Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury asks a different question that adds an important new dimension to the study of public opinion: How do presidents rhetorically use public opinion in their speeches?

In a careful analysis supported by case studies and discrete examples, Drury develops the concept of “invoked public opinion” to study the modern presidents’ use of public opinion as a rhetorical resource. He defines the term as “the rhetorical representation of the beliefs and values of US citizens.”

Speaking with the People’s Voice considers both the strategic and democratic value of invoked public opinion by analyzing how modern presidents argumentatively deploy references to the beliefs and values of US citizens as persuasive appeals as well as acts of political representation in their nationally televised speeches.

JEFFREY P. MEHLTRETTER DRURY is an assistant professor of rhetoric at Wabash College.

What Readers Are Saying:

“Drury explores “invoked public opinion” and he manner in which “modern presidents deploy references to the beliefs and values of US citizens in their national televised speechers” to either persuade or represent them. While acknowledging a sizable literature focused on the former, he urges scholars to pay more attention to the latter. In his analysis, the author considers the role of three common varieties of arguments: bandwagon, identity, and contra populum appeals that serve as correctives to public opinion. He then explores a number of case studies – including Nixon’s 1969 Vietnamization appeal (bandwagon), Carters 1979 “crisis of confidence” speech (identity), and George W. Bush’s 2005 defense of his Iraq policy (contra populum)—to explain how each type of appeal operates. To Drury, presidents must focus on both “leadership of” and “leadership by” public opinion, as persuading others and providing representation are both critical to effective leadership. Highly recommended.”  — Choice

OF RELATED INTEREST

Jimmy Carter, Human Rights, and the National Agend
Presidency and Rhetorical Leadership
White House World
FDR's Body Politics
Review Copy Request Form Desk Copy Request Form